Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal dismissed an appeal in default due to the appellant's failure to appear or pursue a waiver of predeposit with compliance of statutory requirements.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI
Appeal No. 328/2019 Arising out of O.A. No. 178/2013 (DRT-III, Delhi)
Dipak Vyas Vs
The Hongkong & Shanghai Banking Corporation Ltd. & Ors.
04.04.2022 Hon’ble Mr. Justice Brijesh Sethi
Present: Mr. Dhruv Wahi and Mr. Daniel George, Ld. counsel for respondent no.1
Mr. Akshit Kapur, Ld. counsel for respondents 3 and 4
This matter has been taken up by me through Video Conferencing.
None has put in appearance on behalf of the appellant. Last date when someone had appeared for the appellant before this Tribunal was 03.12.2019. Thereafter, on 03.07.2020, 27.08.2020, 13.10.2020, 01.09.2021 none has appeared on behalf of the appellant. There is an application for waiver of predeposit. Reply to the same stands filed. Since none has put in appearance to pursue the same, it is dismissed in default. Consequently, appeal also stands dismissed for want of compliance of the statutory pre-deposit.
(CHAIRPERSON)
-pk
Dipak Vyas
The Hongkong & Shanghai Banking Corporation Ltd.
Brijesh Sethi
As recorded by the court registry
8 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
