The court allowed an interim application for substituting a deceased respondent and set time limits for filing opposition and rejoinder before listing the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Appeal No. 32 of 2020)
(Arising out of S.A. 158 of 2015 in DRT-1, Kolkata)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
06.05.2022 Bhagabati Ojha … Appellant -vsCentral Bank of India & 2 Others … Respondents Mr. Rudra Dev Bagchi, Mr. Subhojit Chatterjee and Mr. D.K. Ojha, led by Mr. A.K. Dhandhania, Learned Counsel for Appellant
Ms. Ritoprita Ghosh, representing Mr. Gautam Chakraborty, Learned Counsel for Respondent No. 1 Central Bank of India
Mr. Debabrata Basu Ray with Ms. Debdutta Chakraborty, Learned Counsel for Respondents No. 2 and 3
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
I.A. 134 of 2022
This application is for substitution of Respondent No. 3, since deceased. The application is allowed being in time.
Applicant to carry out amendment within a period of three days. Substituted Respondent No. 3 (a), 3 (b) and 3 (c) and 3 (d) may file opposition within four weeks; advance copy whereof be supplied to the Appellant; rejoinder, if any, be filed within two weeks thereafter. Application, being I.A. 134 of 2022, is disposed of.
List the matter on 20th July, 2022.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated: 6th May, 2022 09/ac
Bhagabati Ojha
Central Bank of India
Other
Other
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
8 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
