Radhakanta Panda v. Central Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
Adjournment order in SA 107 of 2018 listing matter for hearing on 13.06.2022 with liberty to file affidavit-in-opposition and noting pending vakalatnama.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Diary No. 20 of 2020)
(Arising out of S.A. 107 of 2018 in DRT, Cuttack)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
06.05.2022 Radha Kanta Panda … Appellant -vsCentral Bank of India … Respondent
Mr. Manabendra Thakur, Learned Counsel for Appellant
Ms. Aparajita Rao, Learned Counsel for Respondent Bank
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Learned Counsel, appearing on behalf of Appellant, undertakes to file Vakalatnama with the Registry on or before the date of next date of hearing.
Learned Counsel for Respondents No. 1 and 2 prays for, and is granted, two weeks time to file affidavit-in-opposition; advance copy whereof be served upon Appellant. Appellant may file rejoinder for both the oppositions, if any, in the meantime.
Be it noted if arguments are not placed on the date fixed and adjournment is sought for, interim order, passed earlier, shall be vacated.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Radha Kanta Panda
- respondent
Central Bank of India
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
13 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court