Punjab National Bank v. Rangi Lal and 3 Others
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Regular Appeal No. 285/2016 Date: 28.09.2022
Punjab National Bank Vs. Rangi Lal and Ors.
Present: Shri Anil Kumar Jaiswal, counsel for the appellant, Shri S.K. Verma, counsel for the respondents No. 1 and 2, Shri Subhash Chandra Tiwari, counsel for the respondent No. 4,
Inspite of time being granted twice to the learned counsel for the appellant, no rejoinder has been filed. Let the same be filed by the next date, if so desired.
The office report dated 27.09.2022 shows that inspite of paper publication with regard to service of notice upon the respondents No. 3, no one has put in appearance on their behalf. Let the respondent No. 3 put in appearance and file reply by the next date.
List this case on 23.11.2022 for reply.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
VN Giri
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Punjab National Bank
- respondent
Rangi Lal
- respondent
Respondent No. 4
- respondent
Respondent No. 3
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
8 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court