Canara Bank v. Neelama Pandey and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Listing order in Regular Appeal where the appellate court directed the respondent to file a reply, granted time to the appellant to file a rejoinder, and set a hearing date.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Regular Appeal No. 27/2022 Date: 21.07.2022
Canara Bank Vs. Neelama Pandey
Present: Shri Maneesh Mehrotra, counsel for the appellant, Shri Kushal Kant, counsel for the respondent no. 1,
Learned counsel for the respondent no. 1 seeks time to file reply. Let the same be filed by the next date.
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that he has received a copy of reply filed by the respondent no. 2, who may file rejoinder by the next date.
List this case on 12.10.2022 for reply. Till then the interim order, if any, shall remain operative.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Canara Bank
- respondent
Neelama Pandey
Coram
R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
7 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court