Canara Bank v. Neelama Pandey and Anr.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Regular Appeal No. 27/2022 Date: 17.01.2023
Canara Bank Vs. Neelama Pandey & Anr.
Present: Shri Maneesh Mehrotra, counsel for the appellant, Shri Sandeep Arora, Advocate holding brief of Shri Kushal Kant, counsel for the respondent no. 1,
Learned counsel for the respondent no. 1 seeks further time to file reply.
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that on 5 occasions, the learned counsel for the respondent no. 1 was granted time to file reply, but the same has not been filed till date, therefore, right of the said respondent to file reply may be closed.
As last opportunity, let the reply be filed by the next date, failing which appropriate order shall be passed.
List this case on 21.04.2023 for reply. Till then the interim order, if any, shall remain operative.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Canara Bank
- respondent
Neelama Pandey
Coram
R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
7 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court