The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal allowed an interim application seeking withdrawal of the appeal by consent of the respondent bank and dismissed the appeal
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn; Interim applications dismissed; Interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Appeal No. 251 of 2018)
(Arising out of S.A. 220 of 2016 in DRT-1, Hyderabad)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
04.05.2022 R. Ramachandra
… Appellant -vsState Bank of India … Respondent Mr. Manoj Kumar Singh representing Mr. Nemani Srinivas, Learned Counsel for Appellant
Mr. Soudip Pal Choudhuri with Ms. Saswati Sikder, Learned Counsel for Respondent
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
I.A. 74 of 2022
The present application has been filed praying for withdrawal of the appeal by the Appellant. Respondent Bank has no objection in withdrawal of the appeal.
In view of the above submission, the I.A., being I.A. 74 of 2022, is allowed and the appeal, being Appeal No. 251 of 2018, is dismissed as withdrawn.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
All the interim applications are also dismissed.
File be consigned to record room.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated: 4th May, 2022 02/ac
R. Ramachandra
State Bank of India
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
