Balaka Bajpeyi v. Union Bank of India
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Appeal No. 25 of 2021) (Arising out of Appeal No. 4 of 2018 in DRT-3, Kolkata)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
31.03.2022 Balaka Bajpeyi … Appellant -Vs-
Union Bank of India & 3 Others … Respondents
Mr. Prasenjit Pal Learned Counsel for Appellant
Mr. Debabrata Basu Ray with Ms. Debdutta Chakraborty, Learned Counsel for Respondent No. 1
Mr. Soudip Pal Choudhuri with Ms. Saswati Sikdar, Learned Counsel for Respondent No. 2/Union Bank of India
Mr. Samrat Mukherjee, Learned Counsel for Respondents No. 3 & 4
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
It transpires that Respondents have yet not filed counter affidavit although it is submitted that all the documents, filed before the Leaned Recovery Officer and the Learned Tribunal below, have been annexed in the Memo of Appeal. However, Learned Counsel for the Respondents pray for, and is granted, one week’s time and no more, to file counter affidavit; advance copy whereof be supplied to the Respondents. Rejoinder, if any, be filed within a week thereafter.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Balaka Bajpeyi
- respondent
Union Bank of India
- respondent
3 Others
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
9 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court