Disposed
Smt Bellamkonda Sreelatha v. Kotak Mahindra Bank and Ors.
DRATREGULAR APPEAL/29/2018
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Disposed
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Appeal No. 29 of 2018) (Arising out of S.A. 80 of 2017 in DRT-1, Hyderabad)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
30.03.2022 Smt. Bellamkonda Sreelatha … Appellant
-Vs-
Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited & 2 Others … Respondents
Mr. Nemani Srinivas, Learned Counsel for Appellant
None for Respondents
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Affidavit-of-Service filed shows service upon Respondents No. 2 and 3 is complete through paper publication; taken on record. Thus service upon Respondents No. 2 and 3 is complete.
So far Respondent No. 1/Bank is concerned; they have put in their appearance earlier though today none is appearing to represent Respondent No. 1.
List the matter on 21st June, 2022.
In the meantime, Respondents are at liberty to file Affidavit-inopposition; advance copy whereof be supplied to the Appellant. Rejoinder, if any, be filed upon receipt of copy of opposition; advance copy whereof be supplied to Respondents.
Learned Counsel for the Appellant is directed to communicate this order to the Learned Counsel for the Respondent No. 1 and file Affidavit-of-Service to that effect on the next date.
List the matter on 21st June, 2022.
Sd/(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated: 30th March, 2022 03/ac
Smt. Bellamkonda Sreelatha
Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited
2 Others
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
9 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court