Balaka Bajpeyi v. Union Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
Single judge order recording opposition affidavit in an appeal. Appeal listed for hearing. No merit decided in this paragraph.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Appeal No. 25 of 2021)
(Arising out of Appl. No.4 of 2018 in DRT-3 Kolkata)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
26.09.2022
Balaka Bajpeyi
… Appellant
-VsUnion Bank of India … Respondents Mr. Prasenjit Pal, ld. counsel for the appellant.
Mr. D. Basu Roy, ld. Counsel with Ms. R. Adak and Mr. S. Poddar, ld. Counsel for respondent no. 1 and Mr. S. Pal Chowdhury, ld. Counsel for the respondent.
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Rejoider against the opposition filed by respondent no.1 is taken on record. Affidavit filed by the bank is also taken on record. Reply, if any, be filed by the appellant within two weeks. None is present for respondent no. 3 and 4. They have also not filed any opposition till today.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Balaka Bajpeyi
- respondent
Union Bank of India
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
9 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court