Ramakrishnaiah Muli v. State Bank of India
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Diary No. 456 of 2021)
(Arising out of S.A. 32 of 2018 in DRT, Visakhapatnam)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
05.05.2022 Ramakrishnaiah Muli … Appellant -vsState Bank of India … Respondent Mr. Jishnu Chowdhury with Mr. Ratul Das and Md. Dilawar Khan, Learned Counsel for Appellant
Mr. Pankaj Kumar Mukherjee, Learned Counsel for Respondent No. 1 Bank
Mr. Nemani Srinivas, Learned Counsel for Respondent No. 2 and 3
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
I.A. 344 of 2021 and I.A. 345 of 2021, have already been disposed
of.
Affidavit-in-opposition filed by Respondent No. 2 and 3; be taken on record. Learned Counsel for Respondents No. 1/State Bank of India, waive their right to file opposition.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Ramakrishnaiah Muli
- respondent
State Bank of India
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
10 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court