The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal dismissed the miscellaneous application as infructuous because the Learned Counsel for the Appellant argued that it had become so.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Misc. Application No. 03 of 2022)
(Arising out of S.A. 41 of 2020 DRT-3, Kolkata)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
| 05.05.2022 | UCO Bank -vs- M/s. Untag Limited |
… A Fashions & … Resp |
ppellant Private Others ondents |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mr. Shailesh Counsel for Ap |
Mishra, pellant |
Learned | |
| Mr. Debasish | Chakraba | rti with | |
| Ms. Sharmist Counsel for Re |
ha Pal, spondent |
Learned |
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Learned Counsel for Appellant submits that the Misc. Application has become infructuous.
In view of the aforesaid submission, the Misc. Application, being Misc. Application No. 03 of 2022 is dismissed as infructuous.
Copy of the order be supplied to Appellant and the Respondents and a copy be also forwarded to the concerned DRT. File be consigned to Record room.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated: 5th May, 2022 11/ac
UCO Bank
M/s. Untag Fashions &...
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
