An interim order directing respondent lawyers to file appearance and reply within a specified amendment without dismissing the appeal due to default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Regular Appeal No. 236/2018 Date: 19.09.2022
Central Bank of India Vs. M/s Gopal Ornaments & Ors.
Present: Shri Dhananjay Kumar, Advocate holding brief of Shri S. K. Srivastava, counsel for the appellant, None for the respondents,
The office report dated 16.09.2022 shows that in compliance of the order dated 05.07.2022 of this court, the registry has sent the notice to the respondent nos. 1 to 3 for engaging another counsel, but till date neither the respondent nos. 1 to 3 nor their counsel have appeared.
No reply has been filed on behalf of the respondent no. 4 also to the delay condonation application inspite of several opportunities being granted. Let the same be filed by the next date.
Respondents no. 1 to 3 may put in appearance and file reply by the next date.
List this case on 22.11.2022 for reply.
VN Giri
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Central Bank of India
M/s Gopal Ornaments & Ors.
R. D. Khare
As recorded by the court registry
8 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
