Interim order in a regular appeal. The court directed service of notice on specific respondents due to a judge's elevation and required the remaining respondents to file a reply by the next date after being notified.
Directory service of notice to respondents no. 1 to 3; extension granted to file reply.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Regular Appeal No. 236/2018 Date: 05.07.2022
Central Bank of India Vs. M/s Gopal Ornaments & Ors.
Present: Shri S. K. Srivastava, counsel for the appellant, None for the respondent no. 4,
Shri V. D. Chauhan, as he was then, has been elevated as Judge of the Hon’ble Allahabad High Court, therefore, the registry is directed to issue notice to the respondents no. 1 to 3 within two weeks to engage another counsel.
The office report dated 04.07.2022 shows that no reply has been filed on behalf of the respondents and the delay condonation application is still pending consideration. Let the respondents file reply by the next date, failing which appropriate order shall be passed.
List this case on 19.09.2022 for service.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
VN Giri
Central Bank of India
M/s Gopal Ornaments & Ors.
R. D. Khare
V. N. Giri
As recorded by the court registry
8 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
