Mehboob Thekedar Potato,Onion and Mango Bhandar v. State Bank of India
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I.A. No. 367/2022 & I.A. No. 368/2022 In Appeal Dy. No. 605/2022
Date: 19.09.2022 Mehboob Thekedar Potato, Onion & Mango Bhandar Vs. State Bank of India
Present: Shri Supriy Mishra, counsel for the appellant, Shri Sandeep Arora, counsel for the respondent-Bank,
The record shows that the waiver application being I.A. No. 367/2022 and urgency application being I.A. No. 368/2022 have been filed by the appellant. The report of the Registrar dated 18.09.2022 shows that no pre-deposit has been made.
Shri Sandeep Arora, Advocate has filed his vakalatnama on behalf of the respondent-Bank.
Let the notices be issued to the remaining respondents by two modes i.e. Registered Post with A.D. and Speed Post. Steps to be taken by the appellant within a week. Affidavit of service along with tracking report be filed by the next date.
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that he will serve the copy of appeal upon the counsel for the respondent-Bank today itself, who may file reply by the next date.
Learned counsel for the appellant contends that the property is already in possession of the Bank, but the sale deed may not be executed in favour of the auction purchaser.
The prayer of the appellant shall be considered on the next date.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Mehboob Thekedar Potato, Onion & Mango Bhandar
- respondent
State Bank of India
Coram
R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · September
- CNR
- 091090006052022
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
7 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court