Respondent counsel applied for adjournment; interim stay granted on impugned order; reply due; hearing postponed.
Interim stay granted on impugned order of DRT-II, Mumbai; reply deadline fixed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT : MUMBAI Present :Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Appeal No.21/2022
Between
Fullerton India Credit Company Ltd. … Appellant/s V/s. M/s. Maredia Enterprises & Ors. …Respondent/s
Mr. R. L. Motwani, Advocate for Appellant.
Mr. Sandip Wasnik, Advocate for Respondents.
-: Order dated : 13/05/2022 :-
Ld. Counsel appearing for the Respondents seeks adjournment for filing reply on I.A. No. 74/2022 i.e. application for stay.
Reply, if any, shall be filed within two weeks.
There shall be interim stay to the impugned order dated 04.03.2022 of DRT-II, Mumbai.
Post on 12.07.2022 for hearing.
Sd/Chairperson
mks-8
1
Fullerton India Credit Company Ltd.
M/s. Maredia Enterprises & Ors.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
