The ARDT Mumbai allowed an interim application for substitute service of notice to Respondent No. 2 via newspaper publication directed by the court in Appeal No. 3/2018.
Application for substitute service of notice by newspaper publication for Respondent No. 2 was allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT : MUMBAI Present : Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
I.A. No. 6/2021 (Substitute Service)
In Appeal No. 3/2018
Between Narmada Cars Pvt. Ltd. … Appellant/s V/s. Bank of Baroda & 2 Ors. …Respondent/s Ms. Kamila Baig, i/b M/s. Theba & Associates, Advocate for Appellant. Ms. Hema Desai, i/b M/s. Singhi & Co., Advocate for Respondent No.1.
Mr. Prashant Bothre, i/b M/s. Pan India Legal Services LLP, Advocate for Respondent No.3.
-: Order dated : 12/05/2022 :-
Learned counsel for Appellant submitted that Appellant has deposited both the instalments of pre-deposit together within the stipulated time and has complied with order dated 27.04.2022 in I.A. No. 13/2018.
Appellant has filed I.A. No. 6/2021 i.e. application for substitute service of notice by newspaper publication in respect of Respondent No.2.
I.A. No. 6/2021 is allowed as prayed for and Appellant is directed to do substitute service and produce proof of publication on the next date of hearing.
Respondents who have appeared shall file reply, if any, to the Memo of Appeal on or before the next date with copy to other side. Post on 13.07.2022 for filing proof of publication / hearing.
Sd/-
Chairperson
dpj-4
1
Narmada Cars Pvt. Ltd.
Bank of Baroda
Respondent No. 2
Respondent No. 3
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
