I C I C I Bank Limited v. Deepa Shukla and 2 Ors.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Regular Appeal No. 07/2019 Date: 12.05.2022
ICICI Bank Ltd. Vs. Deepa Shukla & Ors.
Present: Shri Manoj Kumar, Advocate holding brief of Shri V. K. Pandey, counsel for the appellant, None for the respondents,
The office report dated 11.05.2022 shows that no rejoinder has been filed to the reply filed by the respondent no. 2. The report further shows that despite paper publication upon the respondent no. 3, none has put in appearance on his behalf. Let the rejoinder be filed by the next date.
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the arguing counsel Shri V. K. Pandey is out of station, therefore, he is unable to appear before this Tribunal, hence seeks adjournment.
List this case on 22.08.2022 for hearing.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
VN Giri
Parties & counsel
- appellant
ICICI Bank Ltd.
- respondent
Deepa Shukla & Ors.
Coram
R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
6 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court