Central Bank of India v. Symer Tin Private Limited & Ors.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Appeal No. 201/2016
Between
Central Bank of India … Appellant/s V/s. Symer Tin Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. …Respondent/s
Mr. R.K Jha, i/b M/s. R. K. Jha & Associates, Advocate for Appellant.
-: Order dated: 23/09/2022:-
The Appellant, Central Bank of India has filed a fresh vakalatnama. The Ld. Counsel appearing for the Appellant submits that he is yet to get the briefs from earlier counsel who was appearing from the Bank. Hence he seeks time.
The Respondents have not appeared and filed any reply to the application for condonation of delay in filing the Appeal.
Await the appearance of the Respondents and their replies.
The Counsel for the Appellant is directed to get ready for hearing the application for condonation of delay on the next date, positively.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Central Bank of India
- respondent
Symer Tin Pvt. Ltd.
Coram
Ashok Menon
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
11 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court