The tribunal noted that the respondent via respondent 1's application was dismissed for non-payment of costs on the associated ex-parte application. Postponed the ex-parte hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Appeal No. 191/2016
Between State Bank of India … Appellant/s V/s. Nagpur Beghar Mitra Gruh Nirman Sahakari … Respondent/s Sanstha Ltd. & 4 Ors.
Mr Ashish Killedar, Advocate for Appellant.
Respondent No.1 had filed an application for setting aside exparte as M.A. No.227/2019 which application was allowed vide order dated 08.07.2022 on payment of cost but the cost has not been paid.
Hence, the application i.e. M.A. No. 227/2019 stands dismissed. Post on 14.11.2022 for ex-parte hearing.
Sd/Chairperson
dpj-1
1
State Bank of India
Nagpur Beghar Mitra Gruh Nirman Sahakari Sanstha Ltd.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
