The appellate tribunal granted the appellant bank's application to withdraw Vakalatnama, allowing its Officer to represent in person and request time to serve notice on respondents.
Time granted to engage counsel and serve notice on respondents; case listed for subsequent appearance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT : MUMBAI Present : Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Appeal No. 201/2016
Between Central Bank of India … Appellant/s V/s. Symer Tin Pvt. Ltd & Ors. …Respondent/s -: Order dated : 30/03/2022 :-
It is seen that counsel for Appellant has withdrawn his Vakalatnama and today Mr. Matcha Srinivas, Officer of Appellant is present in person. He seeks time to engage another counsel and also to take steps for serving notice on the Respondents. He is given an opportunity to do so.
Post on 19.04.2022 before Registrar for filing Vakalatnama on behalf of Appellant and for service on Respondents.
Sd/Chairperson
dpj/mks-14
1
Central Bank of India
Symer Tin Pvt. Ltd & Ors.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
11 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
