The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal at Kolkata dismissed the appeal of M/s. Canara Bank because the appellant informed the court that the appeal was infructuous. No substantive hearing was conducted.
The appeal was dismissed as the appellant stated it was infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Appeal No. 17 of 2020 (Arising out of SA/89/2013 in DRT 3, Kolkata)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
29.03.2022 Canara Bank … Appellant Vs. Kabindra Kumar Sahoo … Respondent Ms. Aparajita Rao, Counsel for the Appellant. None for respondent.
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Learned Counsel for the appellant, Ms. Aparajita Rao submits that the Appellant does not want to proceed further in the matter since the appeal itself has become infructuous. None is present for the Respondents.
In view of the above submission, the appeal stands dismissed, as infructuous.
File be consigned to record room.
Copy of the order be uploaded in the website of this Tribunal.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson Dated: 29th March, 2022 bose
Canara Bank
Kabindra Kumar Sahoo
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
