Readjourned a regular appeal following the death of the previous counsel for the respondent-Bank, ordering the new counsel to reconstruct the file by the next date.
The matter is adjourned for reconstruction of the file by the next date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Regular Appeal No. 168/2015 Date: 29.07.2022
Shri Vinod Palavat Vs. Punjab National Bank & Ors.
Present: Shri Abhay Kumar Singh, counsel for the appellant, Shri A. P. Singh, counsel for the respondent-Bank,
Learned counsel for the appellant contends that Shri A. P. Singh has put in appearance on behalf of the respondentBank, who is main contesting respondent and the remaining respondents, who are represented through counsel Shri B. K. Srivastava, are proforma respondents, against whom no relief has been sought, therefore, there is no need to serve the notice upon them.
Learned counsel for the respondent-Bank submits that the complete record has not been given to him, who has been subsequently engaged by the respondent-Bank in view of the sad demise of earlier counsel of the Bank, therefore, sometime may be given. Record shows that reply of the served respondents and rejoinder thereto has already been filed. Let the learned counsel for the respondent-Bank reconstruct his file by the next date, on which the matter shall be heard.
List this case on 01.11.2022 for hearing.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Vinod Palavat
R. D. Khare
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
