The bench directed the parties to file a reply within three weeks and get ready for a hearing on 19/10/2022, denying further adjournments as the matter is from 2005.
Direction to file reply within three weeks and be ready for hearing on 19/10/2022; no further adjournment allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Appeal No. 156/2005
Between
… Appellant/s
UCO Bank … Appellant/s V/s. Gammon India Ltd. …Respondent/s Ms Pallavi Chari, i/b Mr O.A. Das, Advocate for Appellant. Mr Ramesh Shah, Advocate for Respondent.
-: Order dated: 05/09/2022:-
There is a change in Vakaltanama for the Respondent and the learned counsel appearing for the Respondent seeks time for a hearing.
The parties are directed to get ready for a hearing on the next date, positively.
Reply, if any, shall be filed within three weeks with an advance copy to the learned counsel for the Appellant.
Post on 19.10.2022 for reply/hearing.
Since the matter is of the year 2005, no further adjournment will be granted.
Sd/Chairperson
dpj-17
1
UCO Bank
Gammon India Ltd.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
9 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
