Santosh Kumari v. Allahabad Bank
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI
Appeal No.154/2022 Arising out of S.A.No.189/2018 (DRT-III, Delhi)
Santosh Kumari Vs
Allahabad Bank & Ors.
& Appeal No.155/2022 Arising out of S.A.No.377/2017 (DRT-III, Delhi)
Santosh Kumari Vs Allahabad Bank & Ors.
16.11.2022 Hon’ble Mr. Justice Brijesh Sethi
Present: Mr. Parvinder Singh, Ld. counsel for appellant
Mr. Shailendra Ojha, Ld. counsel for respondent no.3 – auction purchaser
None for respondents 1 and 2
These matters have been taken up by me through Video Conferencing.
Learned counsel for the appellant states that the appellant is not a borrower, guarantor or mortgagor but a third party purchaser of the property in question.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Santosh Kumari
- respondent
Allahabad Bank & Ors.
Coram
Brijesh Sethi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
13 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court