Bombay Mercantile Co-Operative Bank v. Vinish Mittal and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The Appeal was listed for hearing. The Chairperson, being occupied with a time-bound matter, adjourned the hearing to the 16th of December 2022.
The Appeal was listed for hearing. The Chairperson, being occupied with a time-bound matter, adjourned the hearing to the 16th of December 2022.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI
Appeal No.473/2017 Arising out of S.A.No.122/2016(DRT-I, Delhi)
Bombay Mercantile Co-operative Bank Vs Vinish Mittal & Ors.
16.11.2022 Hon’ble Mr. Justice Brijesh Sethi
Present: Mr. Mohinder Singh, Ld. Counsel for appellant.
Mr. Vinish Mittal, respondent no.1 in person.
Mr. Sumit Bansal, Ld. Counsel for respondents no.9 to 12.
This matter has been taken up by me through Video Conferencing.
List the matter for 16.12.2022 for hearing, as I am busy in dictating order in a time-bound matter today.
(CHAIRPERSON)
PK
Bombay Mercantile Co-operative Bank
Vinish Mittal
Respondents 9 to 12
Brijesh Sethi
As recorded by the court registry
23 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court