The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal in Delhi adjourned an appeal listed for hearing on 15.11.2022. The court listed the matter for the next date due to the respondent counsel's absence from the station and lack of case file.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI
Appeal No.190/2018 Arising out of O.A.No.281/2015 (DRT-II, Delhi)
Kotak Mahindra Bank Vs Hindon River Mills Ltd. & Ors.
15.11.2022 Hon’ble Mr. Justice Brijesh Sethi
Present: Mr. A.K. Mata, Ld. Sr. Advocate along with Mr. Shikhar Kumar, Ld. counsel for appellant bank
Mr. Sanjiv Kakra, Ld. Sr. Advocate along with Mr. Rahul Tyagi, Ld. counsel for respondent no.1
Ms. Shreshtha Mathur, proxy Mr. Ankur Sood, Ld. counsel for respondents 2 and 3
Mr. Hashmat Nabi, Ld. counsel for respondent no.5
This matter has been taken up by me through Video Conferencing.
Learned counsel for respondent no.5 submits that respondent no.5, Export Import Bank of India, has assigned the debt in favour of respondent no.5
Ld. senior counsel for appellant states that respondents 6, 7 and 8 are proforma respondents and, therefore, he does not press service of notice upon them.
Learned counsel for respondent no.5 requests for an adjournment as he is out of station today and is not carrying the case file. At his request, list the matter for 17.11.2022 for hearing.
(CHAIRPERSON)
-pk
Kotak Mahindra Bank
Hindon River Mills Ltd.
Export Import Bank of India
Brijesh Sethi
As recorded by the court registry
22 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
