Nampally Kishan v. Tellangana Grammena Bank and Anr.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Appeal No. 134 of 2018)
(Arising out of S.A. 79 of 2017 in DRT-1, Hyderabad)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
20.6.2022 Nampally Kishan … Appellant -VsTellangana Grammen Bank & Another … Respondents Mr. Nemani Srinivas, Learned Counsel for Appellant Mr. Soudip Pal Choudhuri with Ms. Saswati Sikder, Learned Counsel for Respondent Bank None for Respondent No. 2
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Despite service, none appears to represent Respondent No. 2.
Mr. Nemani Srinivas, Learned Counsel for Appellant prays for, and is granted, adjournment.
List the matter on 29th June, 2022 for hearing.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated: 20th June, 2022 13/ac
Parties & counsel
- appellant
20.6.2022 Nampally Kishan
- respondent
Tellangana Gramen Bank
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
13 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court