Bank of Maharashtra v. Sandeep D. Gawali and Ors.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Appeal No. 118/2013
Between
Bank of Maharashtra … Appellant/s V/s.
Sandeep Dnyandeo Gawali & 2 Ors. … Respondent/s Ms Meena P., i/b Ms Rathina Maravarman, Advocate for Appellant. Mr Vishal Tambe, i/b Mr Vijay V. Chandavale, Advocate for Respondent No.1.
-: Order dated: 20/09/2022:-
Reply was directed to be filed within four weeks. However, the same has not yet been filed.
The learned counsel appearing for the Respondent No.1 seeks further time to file a reply.
Reply, if any, shall be filed within three weeks with an advance copy to the learned counsel appearing for Appellant, positively.
No further time will be granted. Post on 04.11.2022 for reply/hearing.
Sd/Chairperson
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Bank of Maharashtra
- respondent
Sandeep Dnyandeo Gawali
Coram
Ashok Menon
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
4 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court