In I.A. No. 437/2022, the Tribunal allowed an amendment to the record to include an auction purchaser as a respondent in Appeal No. 27/2022. Notice was served, and amendments were directed within two weeks.
Application allowed; new respondent added; amended memorandum to be served.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
I.A. No. 437/2022 (Amendment) In Misc. Appeal No. 27/2022
Between
Sylvia Satindar Mehra … Appellant/s V/s. Bank of Baroda & Ors. … Respondent/s
Mr Prashant Pandit, i/b Ms Durga Soni, Advocate for Appellant. Mr Prashant A. Shinde, i/b M/s. Anant B. Shinde & Co., Advocate for Respondent No.1.
-: Order dated: 20/09/2022:-
I.A. No. 437/2022 is an application for an amendment to bring on record the auction purchaser who has purchased the property pertaining to the Appeal.
I.A. No. 437/2022 is allowed.
Notice on the proposed Respondent has also been served.
The necessary amendment shall be carried out within two weeks and an amended copy of the Appeal memorandum shall be served on the newly added Respondent.
Post on 04.10.2022 before Registrar for compliance.
dpj-16
1
Sylvia Satindar Mehra
Bank of Baroda
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
