State Bank of India v. Ayush Hospital
Case brief
What is this about?
List order granting four weeks to respondent for filing opposition in an appeal arising out of a DRT order, allowing appellant time for rejoinder.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Appeal No. 101 of 2019)
(Arising out of O.A. 160 of 2015 in DRT, Cuttack)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
16.09.2022 State Bank of India … Appellant -VsAyush Hospital & Trauma Care Pvt. Ltd. & ors … Respondent Ms. Sharmistha Pal led by Mr. Debasish Chakrabarti, Learned Counsel for Appellant Mr. Nemani Srinivas, Learned Counsel for Respondents No. 1 and 2
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Learned Counsel for the Respondent prays for and granted four week’s time to file opposition with copy to the Appellant who may file rejoinder within two weeks thereafter.
List on 12th January, 2023 for hearing.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated: 16th September, 2022
13/tp
Parties & counsel
- appellant
State Bank of India
- respondent
Ayush Hospital & Trauma Care Pvt. Ltd.
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
10 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court