rajesh pratap singh v. Bank of Baroda and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The appellant's counsel was indisposed and unable to appear. The case was adjourned to a later date for hearing.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal Dy. No. 486/2019 Date: 17.11.2022
Rajesh Pratap Singh Vs. Bank of Baroda & Ors.
Present: Shri Hari Om Shukla, Advocate holding brief of Shri D. P. Singh, counsel for the appellant, Shri Maneesh Mehrotra, counsel for the respondent,
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the arguing counsel Shri D. P. Singh is indisposed, therefore, he is unable to appear before this Tribunal today, hence he prays for deferment of the case.
As prayed, list this case on 09.02.2023 for hearing.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Rajesh Pratap Singh
- respondent
Bank of Baroda & Ors.
Coram
R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · November
- CNR
- 091090004862019
- Bench
- Rajesh Dayal Khare
All orders in this case
6 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court