The Single Judge listed the case for waiver of pre-deposit on an interim application, holding that no predeposit was required for the interlocutory order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I.A. No. 195/2022 & I.A. No. 158/2022 In Appeal Dy. No. 434/2022
Date: 13.07.2022
M/s Rainbow Board Mills Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. Vs. Punjab National Bank & Anr.
Present: Shri Anadi Krishna Narayan, counsel for the appellants,
The record shows that no pre-deposit has been made by the appellant.
Learned counsel submits that no pre-deposit is required to be made because the present appeal is filed against an interlocutory order.
Learned counsel for the appellant further submits that there is urgency in the matter, as the interim application is pending for consideration.
Let the learned counsel for the appellant explain as to how the present proceedings are maintainable in absence of predeposit on the next date.
Considering the urgency in this matter, list this case on 18.07.2022 for waiver.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
VN Giri
M/s Rainbow Board Mills Pvt. Ltd.
Punjab National Bank
R. D. Khare
V. N. Giri
As recorded by the court registry
13 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
