Naresh Kumar Gupta HUF v. Canara Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
The appellate Tribunal granted the respondent bank two weeks to file a reply to an application before posting the matter for hearing on 09.12.2022.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Appeal on Diary No. 732/2022
Between
Mr Naresh Kumar Gupta HUF
… Appellant/s
V/s.
Canara Bank & Ors.
…Respondent/s
Mr Mayank Bagle, i/b Mr Kushal Sawant, Advocate for Appellant. Ms Vaishali Bhilare, Advocate for Respondent No. 1. Mr Nishant Rana, i/b M/s. Zoustriya, Advocate for Respondent No. 2.
-: Order dated: 01/11/2022:-
The Ld. Counsel for the Respondent Bank seeks further time to file a reply on I.A. No. 472/2022.
Reply, if any, shall be filed within two weeks.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Mr Naresh Kumar Gupta HUF
- respondent
Canara Bank
Coram
Ashok Menon
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
3 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court