On 01/11/2022, a Division Bench of the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal allowed condonation of a three-day delay in filing an appeal against an order of the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Ahmedabad. The court posted the matter for reply/hearing.
Condonation of a three-day delay in filing the appeal was allowed; the main appeal was taken on file.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
I.A. No. 556/2022 (CoD) In
Appeal on Diary No. 790/2022
Between
Shri Umesh Shankarlal Singhal & Ors.
… Appellant/s
V/s.
Bank of Maharashtra & Ors.
…Respondent/s
Mr Rajesh Nagori, i/b Ms Aditi Saxena, Advocate for Appellants.
Mr Sanjay Anabhawane along with Ms Dimple Tejani, i/b M/s. M and S Legal Ventures, Advocate for Respondent No. 1.
Mr Rohit Gupta, i/b Mr Sandeep Solanki, Advocate for Respondent No. 2 to 4.
-: Order dated: 01/11/2022:-
Sd/Chairperson
mks-15
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an application for condonation of delay can be allowed when the delay is only three days and sufficiently explained.
Umesh Shankarlal Singhal & Ors.
Bank of Maharashtra & Ors.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
