Ms Patneswar Rice Mill v. State Bank of India
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Diary no.27/2022 ; Dt.:11/04/2022
M/s. Patneswari Rice Mill through its proprietor Parsuram Meher…...Appellant
Vs.
State Bank of India and ors……….Respondents
Received an application under section 18 of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 presented by Ld. Advocate, Mr. Nemani Srinivas.
Scrutiny of the application reveals the followings:
The application has been filed on behalf of M/s. Patneswari Rice Mill through its proprietor Parsuram Meher against the order dt.16.11.2018 in SA/94/2017 passed by the Ld. Presiding Officer, DRT, Cuttack. Application fees of Rs.14255/- vide T.R. no.115484 dt. 11.03.2022 has been paid along with the application.
The Vakalatnama has been filed by the Ld. Advocate, Mr. Nemani Srinivas.
The case is under the jurisdiction of this Appellate Tribunal.
The Application is not filed well within the period of Limitation but it is accompanied with a petition for condonation of delay in filing.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
M/s. Patneswari Rice Mill
- respondent
State Bank of India
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · April
- CNR
- 191090000272022
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
11 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court