M/s Shigan Export Pvt. Ltd. and Ors. v. Canara Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
Application filed under section 20 of RDBBA, 1993 was identified as beyond limitation but accompanied by petition for condonation. Court noted procedural defects including non-compliance of pre-deposit and missing page numbers in enclosures list.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA Appeal no.250/2017; Dt.:08.04.2022
M/s. Shigan Export Pvt. Ltd. & ors………...Appellant
Vs.
Canara Bank.……….Respondents
Received an application under section 20 of Recovery of Debts due to Banks and Bankruptcy Act, 1993 presented by Ld. Advocate, Mr. Anshu Bhaisya .
Scrutiny of the application reveals the followings:
The application has been filed on behalf of M/s. Shigan Export Pvt. Ltd. & ors. against the order dt.14.08.2017 in OA/69/2017 passed by the Ld. Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Hyderabad. Application fees of Rs.30205/- vide T.R. no.111101 dt. 17.10.2017 has been paid along with the application.
The Vakalatnama has been filed by the Ld. Advocate, Mr. Anshu Bhaisya .
The case is under the jurisdiction of this Appellate Tribunal.
The Application is not within the period of Limitation but accompanied with condonation for delay petition.
The following defects are noted from the Application:
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appellate application filed under section 20 within the period of limitation was maintainable after condonation of delay.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
M/s. Shigan Export Pvt. Ltd. & ors.
- respondent
Canara Bank
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
16 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court