Ms Patneswar Rice Mill v. State Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
An order in an interim application. The court granted two weeks time to Respondent No. 3 to oppose an application and directed service of another application on the other respondents, listing the matter for disposal on 22nd August, 2023.
What did the court decide?
Granted two weeks time to file opposition and directed service of the application on other respondents.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Diary No. 27 of 2022
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
CHAIRPERSON
05.07.2023 M/s. Patneswari Rice Mill … Appellant -VsState Bank of India & 2 Others … Respondents Mr. Nemani Srinivas, Learned Counsel for Appellant Mr. Soudip Pal Choudhuri with Ms. Saswati Sikder, Learned Counsel for the Respondents No. 1 and 2/ Bank Mr. Nimish Mishra, with Mr. Gaaurav Singh and Mr. Abir Mondal, LearnedCounsel for the Respondent No. 3
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Respondent No. 3 is served with copy of I.A. 15 of 2022 today. He prays for and is granted two weeks time to file opposition. Copy of I.A. 14 of 2022 be also served upon the Respondents. List on 22nd August, 2023 for disposal of I.A. 14 of 2022 and I.A. 15 of 2022.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated 05th July, 2023 04/ac
Parties & counsel
- appellant
M/s. Patneswari Rice Mill
- respondent
State Bank of India
- respondent
Respondent No. 2
- respondent
Respondent No. 3
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · July
- CNR
- 191090000272022
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
11 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court