Mr Mohinder Narula and Anr. v. South Indian Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
The court directed the appellants to file the Vakalatnama and rejoinder by the next date due to the absence of the Vakalatnama as per the office report.
What did the court decide?
Vakalatnama along with rejoinder to be filed by the next date.
What the court decided
Appeal Dy. No. 244/2019 Date: 26.04.2022
Mr. Mohinder Narula and Anr. Vs. South Indian Bank
Present: None for the appellants, Shri Maneesh Mehrotra, counsel for the respondent-Bank,
Perusal of the earlier order dated 22.02.2022 shows that on that date Shri Anirudh Pandey, Advocate had sought time to file vakalatnama on behalf of the appellants, but the office report dated 25.04.2022 shows that no vakalatnama has been filed till date.
Learned counsel for the respondent-Bank submits that he has already filed reply.
Let the Vakalatnama along with rejoinder be filed on behalf of the appellant by the next date.
List this case on 16.08.2022 for rejoinder.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
VN Giri
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Mr. Mohinder Narula and Anr.
- respondent
South Indian Bank
Coram
R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
3 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court