Matter was taken up via video conferencing. The Court adjourned the application to seek clarification from the respondent FI's client. No substantive decision was rendered.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI
Misc. Application No. 70/2020 In Misc. Appeal No. 125/2017 Arising out of S.A. No. 311/2016 (DRT-I, Delhi)
Sushil kumar Jolly Vs Cholamandalam Investment & Finance Co. & Ors.
14.09.2022 Hon’ble Mr. Justice Brijesh Sethi
Present: Mr. Anand Aggarwal, Ld. counsel for appellant
Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, Ld. counsel for respondent no.1 FI
This matter has been taken up by me through Video Conferencing.
At request of the learned counsel for the respondent FI for seeking clarification from his client on certain aspect of the matter, matter is adjourned to 11.10.2022.
(CHAIRPERSON)
-pk
Sushil kumar Jolly
Cholamandalam Investment & Finance Co.
Brijesh Sethi
As recorded by the court registry
8 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
