The Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal in default as no counsel appeared for the appellants despite repeated summonses via video conferencing. The respondent bank’s counsel was present.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI
Appeal No. 461/2018
Arising out of O.A. No. 3147/2017 (DRT-I, Chandigarh)
M/s Aradhana Wines & Ors.
Vs
State Bank of India
14.09.2022 Hon’ble Mr. Justice Brijesh Sethi
Present: None for the appellants
Mr. Vipan Datta, Ld. counsel for respondent bank
This matter has been taken up by me through Video Conferencing.
None is present for the appellants despite repeated calls.
Appeal is dismissed in default.
(CHAIRPERSON)
-pk
M/s Aradhana Wines & Ors.
State Bank of India
Justice Brijesh Sethi
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
