The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal issued a direction to issue fresh notice to respondents 5 to 9 by all permissible modes for a specified date, as they could not be served, and listed the matter for hearing on that date.
Direction to issue fresh notice to respondents 5 to 9.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI
Misc. Appeal No.85/2022 Arising out of O.A.No.754/2018(DRT-I, Jaipur)
Punjab National Bank Vs M/s Atlas Alloys Pvt. Ltd.
16.11.2022 Hon’ble Mr. Justice Brijesh Sethi
Present: Mr. Khalid Abdullah, proxy for Mr. Rajinder Wali, Ld. counsel for appellant
Mr. Rajeeve Mehra, Ld. Sr. Advocate along with Ms. Arti Shrama, Ld. counsel for respondents no.2 and 3.
None for other respondents
This matter has been taken up by me through Video Conferencing.
Learned counsel for appellant states that respondents 5 to 9 could not be served and, therefore, fresh notice may be issued against them. Heard. Let fresh notice be issued to respondents 5 to 9 by all permissible modes for 27.01.2023.
(CHAIRPERSON)
pk
Punjab National Bank
M/s Atlas Alloys Pvt. Ltd.
Other respondents 1 to 4
Other respondents 5 to 9
Brijesh Sethi
As recorded by the court registry
9 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
