A miscellaneous appeal was disposed of by directing the appellant to substitute the second respondent bank which had merged, without further adjudication on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Misc. Appeal No. 38/2012
Between
LIC Housing Finance Ltd. … Appellant/s
V/s.
State Bank of India & Anr. …Respondent/s
Mr Sandeep Barve, i/b M/s. B.K. Barve & Co., Advocate for Appellant.
Mr Aakash Acharya, Advocate for Respondent No.1
-: Order dated: 20/07/2022:-
Appellant has not taken steps to substitute 2nd Respondent Bank which has merged with Canara Bank despite there being directions to do so.
Appellant is directed to take necessary steps expeditiously. Post on 29.08.2022 for steps.
Sd/Chairperson
dpj-20
1
LIC Housing Finance Ltd.
State Bank of India
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
