Praveen Prabhakaran Earully v. Hdfc Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
The court dismissed an urgent relief application as the appellant failed to comply with office objections. The hearing is to be postponed for compliance.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Appeal on Diary No. 387/2022
Between
Praveen P. Earully … Appellant/s V/s. The Board of Directors of Housing …Respondent/s Development Finance Corporation Ltd. & Ors.
Ms. Sweta Ughade, i/b M/s. Nedumpara & Nedumpara, Advocate for Appellant.
Mr. Shreesh Oak, i/b M/s. SC Legal, Advocate for Respondent No.1
-: Order dated: 20/07/2022:-
The matter is taken up for hearing by way of Praecipe filed by Appellant for seeking urgent relief even though it was not on the regular Board of this Tribunal.
The objections raised by the Office in the Appeal papers have not been complied with by the Appellant.
The Appellant is directed to comply with all the objections raised by the Office and thereafter the matter shall be posted for hearing.
Post on 24.08.2022 before Registrar for compliance.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Praveen P. Earully
- respondent
The Board of Directors of Housing Development Finance Corporation Ltd.
Coram
Ashok Menon
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · July
- CNR
- 271090003872022
- Bench
- Ashok Menon
All orders in this case
3 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court