Disposed
Union Bank of India v. Rolta India Limited
DRATMISC APPEAL/247/2022
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Disposed
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI
Misc. Appeal No. 247/2022 Arising out of T.A. No. 27/2022 (DRT-III, Delhi)
Union Bank of India Vs Rolta India Ltd. &Ors.
03.11.2022 Hon’ble Mr. Justice Brijesh Sethi
Present: Mr. Sanjiv Kaka, Ld. Sr. Advocate along with Mr. Samarendra Kumar, Ld. counsel for appellant
Mr. Rajeeve Mehra, Ld. Sr. Advocate along with Mr. Shadab S Jan and Mr. Shivam Shukla, Ld. counsel for respondent no.1
Ms. Nehha Rukhana, Ld. counsel for Kotak Mahindra Bank
This matter has been taken up by me through Video Conferencing.
Pursuant to the notice issued yesterday, i.e. 02.11.2022, Ms. Nehha Rukhana has appeared for Kotak Mahindra Bank, respondent no.6, today and states that the bank has no submissions to make and it will abide by the orders passed by this Tribunal.
Heard part arguments of learned counsel for respondent no.1 for more than two hours. For continuation of arguments, list on 04.11.2022.
(CHAIRPERSON)
-pk
Union Bank of India
Rolta India Ltd.
Kotak Mahindra Bank
Justice Brijesh Sethi
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court