Union Bank of India v. Rolta India Limited
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI
Misc. Appeal No. 247/2022 Arising out of T.A. No. 27/2022 (DRT-III, Delhi)
Union Bank of India Vs Rolta India Ltd. &Ors.
02.11.2022 Hon’ble Mr. Justice Brijesh Sethi
Present: Mr. Sanjeev Kakra, Ld. Sr. Advocate along with Mr. Samrendra Kumar, Ld. Counsel for appellant. Mr. Rajeeve Mehra, Ld. Sr. Advocate along with Mr. Shivam Shukla, Ld. Counsel for respondent no.1.
This matter has been taken up by me through Video Conferencing.
Heard arguments on behalf of the appellant for about two hours.
Ld. Counsel for appellant says that all other respondents except respondent no.1 are proforma parties. However, appellant is directed to serve them also for tomorrow i.e. 03.11.2022.
(CHAIRPERSON)
N
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Union Bank of India
- respondent
Rolta India Ltd.
- respondent
And/or
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
7 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court