Mr Muslim Firoze Amruddin v. Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The court noted the absence of the appellant's counsel. A stay application was to be heard jointly with the main appeal on 14.11.2022.
The court noted the absence of the appellant's counsel. A stay application was to be heard jointly with the main appeal on 14.11.2022.
In the absence of the appellant's counsel, the court adjourned the miscellaneous appeal and the accompanying stay application to be heard on 14.11.2022.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Misc. Appeal No. 1/2014
Between
Mr Muslim Firoze Amruddhin … Appellant/s
V/s.
Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Pvt. Ltd. … Respondent/s & Ors.
Mr. Akbar Rizvi, i/b M/s. AKS Legal Consultant, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1 to 7
-: Order dated: 22/09/2022:-
The learned counsel appearing for the Respondent is filing a reply to the Misc. Appeal No. 1/2014 during the course of the day and undertakes to serve a copy of the same on the learned counsel appearing for the Appellant.
Today, there is no representation for the Appellant.
M.A. No.7/2014 which is an application for the stay shall be
taken up along with the Appeal
Post on 14.11.2022 for hearing.
Sd/Chairperson
dpj-4
1
Mr Muslim Firoze Amruddhin
Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Pvt. Ltd.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court