The Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal allowed an application to substitute Dena Bank with Bank of Baroda as a respondent in Appeal No. 475/2006 on account of the merger of Dena Bank with Bank of Baroda.
Application to substitute Respondent No. 5 (Dena Bank) with Bank of Baroda was allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson I.A. No. 432/2022 (Substitution)
In
Appeal No. 475/2006
Between
Govindbhai Chhababhai Patel (since deceased) … Appellant/s through his Legal Representatives & Ors.
V/s.
Ganapati Pulp & Paper Mills Ltd. (under … Respondent/s Liquidation) & Ors.
Ms Sonali Jain along with Mr Apurva Vakil, Advocate for Appellants. Mr. Rupak Swangikar, i/b M/s. V. Deshpande & Co., Advocate for Respondent No.4.
Mr Nilesh Bamne, i/b M/s. A. R. Bamne & Co., Advocate for Respondent No.5.
-: Order dated: 22/09/2022:-
Sd/Chairperson
dpj-9
1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether Respondent No. 5, Dena Bank, should be substituted with Bank of Baroda, into which it has merged.
Govindbhai Chhababhai Patel
Ganapati Pulp & Paper Mills Ltd.
Dena Bank
Bank of Baroda
ASREC
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
