The order recorded an application for adjournment by the appellant and by respondent counsel. Time was accorded for filing a reply which was to be submitted within four weeks. The matter was postponed for hearing on 22 September 2022. No substantive question of law or fact was decided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT : MUMBAI Present : Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Misc. Appeal No. 1/2014
Between
Mr. Muslim Firzone Amirudhin … Appellant/s V/s. Asset Reconstruction Company(India) Pvt. Ltd. …Respondent/s & 11 Ors.
Mr. Pradeep Bhor, i/b Mr. Ismail Nasikwala, Advocate for Appellant.
Mr. Akbar Rizvi, i/b M/s. AKS Legal Consultants, Advocate for Respondent No.1.
-: Order dated : 29/06/2022 :-
The learned counsel appearing for the Appellant seeks adjournment on personal grounds.
The learned counsel appearing for Respondent No.1 also seeks time to file a reply.
Reply, if any, shall be filed within four weeks with an advance copy to Appellant’s counsel, positively.
Post on 22.09.2022 for reply/hearing.
Sd/Chairperson
dpj-30
1
Mr. Muslim Firzone Amirudhin
Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Pvt. Ltd.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
