Vijay Laxmi Goel v. State Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
A default appeal filed by an appellant was dismissed due to non-appearance. The respondent bank was represented. No substantive arguments were recorded.
A default appeal filed by an appellant was dismissed due to non-appearance. The respondent bank was represented. No substantive arguments were recorded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI
Misc. Appeal No.160/2021 Arising out of S.A.No.27/2020 (DRT-I, Chandigarh)
Vijay Laxmi Goel Vs State Bank of India
14.12.2022 Hon’ble Mr. Justice Brijesh Sethi
Present: None for the appellant
Mr. Amrendra Singh, Ld. counsel for respondent bank
This matter has been taken up by me through Video Conferencing.
None has put in appearance on behalf of the appellant.
Appeal is dismissed in default.
(CHAIRPERSON)
-pk
Vijay Laxmi Goel
State Bank of India
Brijesh Sethi
As recorded by the court registry
9 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court